In class today we took turns presenting in a group of 5, each with different set roles – Presentor, note-taker, good cop, bad cop and industry. The three different critique roles helped give a framework to respond with when providing feedback to the presenter.
This was quite a successful way to handle critique and I heard a lot of positive things about how the whole thing ran.
It was somewhat helpful to try and talk about my project in a way that I would present it at the end – however for it to be more valuable I would have had to prepare a lot more. I did get some helpful points to consider about how to explain my project more clearly.
- Consider and explain the ‘problem’ that I faced initially
- Showing the process was very valuable and gave a much better understanding – it was successful talking while the video was playing.
- It was not super clear which tools/programs I used to create the project – what did I code and what was found online?
- Audience?? Who will use this process/who is it for
- Make clear it is a positive prospective look – AI isn’t taking all the jobs, we are collaborating with/along side it
VCD 453 - Jason Fastier 